The applicant contended that the earlier order was complied with and the justification for the contempt application no longer existed. The Single Judge dismissed the contempt application and discharged any notices issued.
Contempt application dismissed; contempt notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 711 of 2025
Applicant :- Jagannath Prasad Opposite Party :- Sri Bal Mukund Prasad, District Inspector Of Schools Hardoi
Counsel for Applicant :- Shrawan Kumar Verma
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Ms. Anamika Tiwari, learned counsel has filed her vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant. The same is taken in the record.
Ms. Anamika Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. The cause of action on which the contempt application was founded does not survive.
The contempt application is accordingly dismissed.
The contempt notices issued to the contemnor, if any, are discharged.
Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Ashish Tripathi
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jagannath Prasad
Sri Bal Mukund Prasad
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
