A contempt application over non-compliance with a writ court order was dismissed as infructuous after counsel conceded that the applicant's representation had been decided in compliance with the judgment, and any earlier notices were discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:76
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3475 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt. Asha Devi Opposite Party :- Sri Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Distt. Basic Education Officer Sitapur
Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Kumar,Manoj Kumar Chaurasiya Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rishabh Tripathi,Arun Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Shri Manoj Kumar Chaurasiya, learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order dated 14.03.2024 passed in Writ A No. 2026 of 2024, the representation of the applicant has been decided, as per order of the Writ court and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
As prayed, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 2.1.2025 Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition remained live after the representation was decided in compliance with the writ court's order.
Smt. Asha Devi
Sri Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Distt. Basic Education Officer Sitapur
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
