Dismissed

Rashmi Srivastava v. Shri Abhishek Anand District Magistrate Sitapur

Allahabad HC4 Sept 2025CAPL/1165/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt application dismissed as infructuous; respondent (District Magistrate, Sitapur) filed compliance affidavit showing compliance with writ court judgment and order; notice discharged; Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; applicant Rashmi Srivastava; opposite party Shri Abhishek Anand; single Judge Manish Kumar, J.; decided September 4, 2025; CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1165 of 2025.

What the court decided

AI extract

Rashmi Srivastava Vs Shri Abhishek Anand District Magistrate Sitapur — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1165 of 2025

Rashmi Srivastava

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

Shri Abhishek Anand District Magistrate Sitapur

¶7

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Sachin Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:
Court No.- 17

¶8

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.

¶9

The respondent has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.

¶11

In view of above, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶12

Notice, if any, stands discharged.

¶13

September 4, 2025 Nitesh

¶14

(Manish Kumar,J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rashmi Srivastava v. Shri Abhishek Anand District Magistrate Sitapur

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Rashmi Srivastava v. Shri Abhishek Anand District Magistrate Sitapur

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Vilas Vs Shri Atal Kumar Rai, Director Panchayati Raj U.P. Lko.

Dr. Prakash Chandra Vs Arvind Kumar Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Medical and Health Civil

Madan Singh Vs Sri Kunal Silku M.D., Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd., Lko. and Another

Narendra Kumar vs Mr. Ajay Kumar Shukla Secy. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko and 3 Others

Ashok Kumar Singh and Another Vs Sri Dilip Kumar Sarkar Superintending Engineer P.W.D. Lko.

Ravindra Swaroop Vs Smt. Pramita Singh, Executive Officer Nagar Palika Parishad Bahraich