Contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution as neither counsel appeared when the case was called out in the revised list; any notice issued stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1922 of 2015
Dr. Prakash Chandra
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Arvind Kumar Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical And Health Civil .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called out in the revised list.
The case is listed under the heading "These matters, be not adjourned" .
Neither the learned counsels for the both sides are present nor any request has been made on their behalf to adjourn the case.
In view of the aforesaid, the present contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Notice issued, if any, stands discharged.
September 3, 2025 Mahesh
(Manish Kumar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dr. Prakash Chandra
Arvind Kumar Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical And Health Civil
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
