Kuldeep Singh @ Kallu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38623

Court No. - 14

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6279 of 2025

Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh @ Kallu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶6

1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

¶7

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the gang chart, two cases have been shown against the applicant. In both the cases, the applicant has been enlarged on bail. The bail orders are annexed with the affidavit filed in support of the bail application as Annexure No.3 as well as in the supplementary affidavit filed today which is taken on record. Apart from these cases, there is no other case pending against the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 25.3.2023.

¶8

It is also submitted that the applicant is ready to furnish an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

¶9

It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶10

3. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as also the fact that the accused applicant has been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart and there is no other case pending against him, arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, for the period for which he is in jail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail.

¶12

5. Let the applicant Kuldeep Singh alias Kallu, involved in Case Crime No.298 of 2023 under Sections 2/3 U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S.Manjhila, district Hardoi be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction

¶13

of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶14

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶15

(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶18

(v) The applicant shall also file an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case or misuse the liberty of bail.

¶19

(vi) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A I.P.C.(now section 269 BNS)

¶20

(vii) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C.(now section 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A I.P.C. (now section 209 BNS).

¶21

6. The bail application is allowed accordingly.

¶22

Order Date :- 8.7.2025 kkb/

¶23

Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Kuldeep Singh @ Kallu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Singh @ Kallu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Prem Kumar Bajpai Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Anand Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Masrur Ahmad in Fir Masroof Ahmad @ Masrur Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko

Vishal Maurya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Principal Secretary Lko.

Mohd. Tauseef Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Akif Ali @ Akib Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.