Allowed

Illa Alias Altaf v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC25 Apr 2025BAIL/4869/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Sections 109, 118(1) and 191(3) BNS arising from Fatehpur. Applicant alleged false implication; injuries on the complainant were inconsistent with the allegation. Finding no stringent evidence or likelihood of tampering, the court granted bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions including no witness tampering and appearance on fixed dates.

Illa Alias Altaf vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75913

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4869 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Illa Alias Altaf Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Devesh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd Illa Alias Altaf dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 390 lu 2024] vUrxZr /kkjk 109, 118(1), 191(3) B.N.S., Fkkuk dksrokyh] ftyk Qrsgiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vkil esa jk; e’kfojk djds diksydfYir dFkkud ds vk/kkj ij dkQh foyEc ls ntZ djk;h x;h gS] bl foyEc dk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k gS] oknh o pqVSy jktw us fpfdRld ls feydj QthZ pksVsa cuok;h gSa] oknh dk yM+dk vkijkf/kd fdLe dk O;fDr gS vkSj vDlj vius lkfFk;ksa ds lkFk ywVikV djrk jgk gS] vkosnd us dksbZ vijk/k ugha dkfjr fd;k] pqVSy ds flj ij vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk pkiM+ ls geyk djds pksVsa igqWpkuk dgk x;k gS] fdUrq fpfdRlh; ijh{k.k vk[;k esa pqVSy dks pkiM+ dh dksbZ pksVsa ugha ik;h x;h gSa] fpfdRld ds vuqlkj mlds gM~Mh ij dksbZ pksV ugha ik;h x;h] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 4&9&2024 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶13

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶14

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶15

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶16

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶17

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

¶18

fn0 % 9&5&2025 ds0lh0flag

¶19

2 of 2

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Illa Alias Altaf v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Illa Alias Altaf v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shailesh Vishwakarma vs State of U.P.

Bhagat Singh vs State of U.P.

Shivnath Kanaujiya vs State of U.P.

Saumya Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Akash Yadav vs State of U.P.

Anil vs State of U.P. and 3 Others