Dismissed¶10
Jatindra @ Teimpo @ Jitendra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home and 3 Others
Allahabad HCBAIL/434/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Infructuous bail application dismissed — trial already concluded. Jatindra @ Teimpo @ Jitendra versus State of U.P. (Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Home) and 3 others; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 434 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 12; Pankaj Bhatia, J.; decided November 24, 2025; no merits adjudication; no statutory provisions or precedents engaged; counsel for applicant: Pankaj Kumar Tripathi and Krishan Bhushan; counsel for opposite parties: G.A.
What did the court decide?
On being informed by learned counsel for the applicant that the trial of the case in question had already been concluded, the Court found that the present bail application had become infructuous. ¶9