Bail application dismissed as infructuous after counsel informed the court that the trial in the underlying case had already concluded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 434 of 2025
Jatindra @ Teimpo @ Jitendra
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. And 3 Others |
Deptt. Of Home | ... | ..Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Pankaj Kumar, Tripathi |
Krishan | Bhushan |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
November 24, 2025
V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jatindra @ Teimpo @ Jitendra
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. And 3 Others
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
