Allowed

Rishi Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Nov 2025BAIL/38674/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application by an accused not named in the FIR but implicated on general allegations; co-accused with similar roles had been granted bail. The court allowed the application and released the applicant on bail on personal bond with two sureties and standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties each in like amount to satisfaction of the court concerned.

Rishi Singh vs State of U.P. — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38674 of 2025

¶3

Rishi Singh

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manzar Saeed, Nisha Singh Parihar, R. P. Singh Parihar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 69

¶7

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶8

Heard Sri R.P. Singh Parihar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Roshan Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶9

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.13 of 2025, under Sections190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 109(1) BNS, Police StationSaraimamrej, District-Prayagraj, during the pendency of the trial.

¶10

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant was not named in the FIR. Subsequently on the basis of general allegation, he was falsely implicated by the injured witnesses. It is further submitted that co-accused having similar role to that of the applicant namely, Mangala Alias Vishal Yadav, Arif Sekh and Satyam Bind, have already been released on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 15118 of 2025, 9696 of 2025 and 23493 of 2025 vide orders dated 06.05.2025, 27.06.2025 and 22.09.2025 respectively. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. It is further submitted that the applicant has explained the criminal history of one case in the accompanying affidavit. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 07.10.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he

¶11

BAIL No. 38674 of 2025

¶12

¶13

will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶14

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶15

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶16

Let the applicant- Rishi Singh, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶17

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶19

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶20

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶21

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶22

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶23

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official

¶24

BAIL No. 38674 of 2025

¶25

¶26

website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶27

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶28

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶29

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶30

November 13, 2025 S.C.

¶31

Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rishi Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishi Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khushi Ram vs State of U.P.

Jyoti vs State of U.P.

Waseem vs State of U.P.

Lalji Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Vivek Rajpoot vs State of U.P.

Dharmesh @ Dharmendra and 2 Others vs State of U.P.