Pravindra vs State of U.P.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The F.I.R. was lodged against five persons including the applicant with the allegation that after hearing noise when informant reached at the spot he found dead body of his brother in an agricultural field. In the FIR the informant states that it came into light to him that the named accused had killed his brother. The role of having caused gunshot injury to the deceased has been assigned to the co-accused, Akshay. Learned counsel further submits that on the same set of allegation and evidence one co-accused, namely, Nitin, who was also named in the FIR has already been enlarged on bail and as the case of applicant is not on the worse footing than that of the aforesaid co-accused, Nitin and the role of applicant is different from the role of co-accused, Akshay, against whom there is allegation of causing gunshot injury to the deceased, therefore, applicant may also be enlarged on bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that the applicant is languishing in jail since 16.03.2025, with no criminal history.

¶10

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant but he could not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, but he could not dispute that specific role of causing gunshot injury is assigned to the co-accused, Akshay.

¶11

BAIL No. 35844 of 2025

¶12

2

¶13

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and considering that specific role of causing gunshot injury to the deceased has been assigned to the coaccused, Akshay, without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶14

Let the applicant-Pravindra, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 56 of 2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 103(1), 61(2), 238A of B.N.S., Police Station- Chhaprauli, District- Baghpat, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶15

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶16

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.

¶17

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.

¶18

iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission.

¶19

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶20

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law.

¶21

(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)

¶22

November 13, 2025

¶23

Mustaqeem.

¶24

Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pravindra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pravindra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Naseem Ansari vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Deepu Alias Deepak vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Deepchand vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dipankar Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Balbir Adhana vs State of U.P. and Another

Junaid vs State of U.P. and 3 Others