Harendra Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application deferred pending victim ossification (age-determination) test; HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34599 of 2025; Harendra Yadav versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others; counsel Bindu Kumari, Janardan Yadav; G.A.; Case Crime No. 380 of 2024; Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; Sections 5(M)/6 POCSO Act; Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act; Thana Maharajganj, district Azamgarh; Chief Judicial Magistrate directive; ossification test within one month; report by next fixed date; Registrar Compliance 48-hour intimation; relisted 09.01.2026; Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.; December 4, 2025.
What did the court decide?
No immediate grant or refusal of bail; interim administrative directives only (ossification test within one month, report to this Court by next date, 48-hour compliance intimation), with the application deferred and to be relisted on 09.01.2026.