Pramod Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33095 of 2025

Pramod Kumar Singh		.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P. and Another		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)		: Lackey Keshari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)		: G.A.

¶3

Court No. - 69

¶4

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶5

Heard Sri Lackey Keshari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Alok Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.43 of 2015, under Sections-364-A, 506, 120-B, 34 IPC, Police Station-Mughalsarai, District-Chandauli, during the pendency of the trial.

¶7

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case, though he was not named in the FIR. Subsequently, the abductee recovered from the possession of Tanjeem Ahmad and Kamal Raja and on the basis of confessional statement, name of the applicant surfaced. It is further submitted that the applicant has explained the criminal history of four cases in the accompanying affidavit. It is further submitted that the applicant was not aware about the present case and his remand was taken on the basis of Warrant B of the present case, while he was in jail in another case, being Case Crime No.219 of 2013. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law-abiding

¶8

BAIL No. 33095 of 2025

¶9

2

¶10

citizen and is languishing in jail since 05.05.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶11

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶12

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶13

Let the applicant- Pramod Kumar Singh, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶14

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶16

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶17

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶20

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order,

¶21

BAIL No. 33095 of 2025

¶22

3

¶23

downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶24

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶25

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶26

November 21, 2025 S.C.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶28

Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pramod Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kundan Yadav Alias Ankit Yadav vs State of U.P.

Anshu Alias Ansh and Another vs State of U.P.

Ali Alias Rahil Jamal Shamsi vs State of U.P.

Ramashankar vs State of U.P.

Javed Akhtar vs State of U.P.

Nikhil Singh Alias Nihal Singh vs State of U.P.