Ramashankar vs State of U.P.

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.449 of 2025, under Sections118(2) and 352 of BNS, Police Station-Kosi Kalan, District-Mathura, during the pendency of the trial.

¶13

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that though in the FIR first informant made allegation against the applicant for causing injury to the injured Soni but the injured Soni in her statement did not specifically namd the applicant for causing a sole injury in her toe. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 14.07.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶14

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶15

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶16

Let the applicant- Ramashankar, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶17

BAIL No. 33029 of 2025

¶18

2

¶19

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶20

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶21

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶22

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶23

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶24

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶25

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶26

October 15, 2025 S.C.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶28

Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramashankar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramashankar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kundan Yadav Alias Ankit Yadav vs State of U.P.

Anshu Alias Ansh and Another vs State of U.P.

Ali Alias Rahil Jamal Shamsi vs State of U.P.

Javed Akhtar vs State of U.P.

Nikhil Singh Alias Nihal Singh vs State of U.P.

Jagbhan vs State of U.P.