Disposed¶18

Babloo v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Sept 2025BAIL/25017/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad HC, 28-10-2025, Crl. Misc. Bail Application 25017 of 2025, Babloo v. State of U.P., Krishan Pahal, J. — interim order: Trial Judge to send fresh tabulated trial-status report (charge-framing date, prosecution witnesses proposed/examined, adjournments, or disposal date/result); matter relisted 19.11.2025 with report; copy via Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX. No statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

No decision on bail; interim procedural order — Trial Judge directed to furnish a fresh trial-status report, matter relisted for 19.11.2025 with the report, and order copy routed via the Registrar (Compliance). ¶18

Babloo vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Further adjudication of Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 25017 of 2025 (Babloo v. State of U.P.) stood deferred pending receipt of the Trial Judge's fresh trial-status report.

¶18

Court's answer

The Trial Judge was directed to send forthwith a fresh report, in tabulated form, on the status of the trial: (i) date of framing of the charge; (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet (eye-witness, expert witness etc.); (iii) names and number of prosecution witnesses already examined with dates; (iv) occasions on which the witness was present and the case was adjourned, with reasons for adjournment; and (v) where the trial has been decided, the date of disposal and result instead of those details.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

The matter was listed for 19.11.2025 in the daily cause list along with the report, and a copy of the order was to be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Krishan Pahal, J.), order dated October 28, 2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 25017 of 2025 (Babloo v. State of U.P.): purely administrative interim order — no bail decision taken. The learned Trial Judge was directed to send forthwith a fresh report, in tabulated form, regarding the status of the trial, detailing: (i) date of framing of charge; (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet (eye-witness, expert witness etc.); (iii) prosecution witnesses already examined with dates; (iv) witness attendances and adjournments with reasons; or, if the trial has been decided, only the date of disposal and result. Matter listed for 19.11.2025 in the daily cause list along with the report; copy of the order to be conveyed to the Trial Judge through the District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25017 of 2025

Babloo

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ashutosh Mishra, Shailendra Kumar Ojha
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 67

¶10

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶11

List has been revised. Learned counsel for the applicant is present.

¶12

Learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report regarding the status of the trial of the present case with the following details in tabulated form:-

¶13

(i) Date on which the charge was framed.

¶14

(ii) Number and particulars (i.e. name, nature of witness like eye witness and expert witness etc.) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet.

¶15

(iii) Names and number of prosecution witnesses who have been examined before the trial court with dates.

¶16

(iv) Number of times the witness was present and the case was adjourned along with the reason for the adjournment.

¶17

(v) The trial court need not send the aforesaid details, if the trial has been decided, but the date of disposal and the result be mentioned.

¶18

List on 19.11.2025 in the daily cause list alongwith the report.

¶19

A copy of this order be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

¶20

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶21

October 28, 2025 (Ravi Kant)

¶22

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Babloo v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babloo v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Abhishek Jatav vs State of U.P.

Rautan Singh vs State of U.P.

Ravi vs State of U.P.

Rahul Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Haidar Ali vs State of U.P.

Abdul Ali vs State of U.P.