Allowed¶12

Abhishek Jatav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Sept 2025BAIL/31737/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court bail grant under U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Sections 2 & 3; Case Crime No. 410 of 2025, P.S. Muradnagar, Ghaziabad; applicant Abhishek Jatav; gang chart based on two cases with prior bail; plea of false implication due to police rivalry; no previous conviction; custody since 2.8.2025; AGA opposed; bail allowed without merits opinion with standard conditions; Judge Krishan Pahal; decided 23.09.2025; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31737 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to applicant Abhishek Jatav in Case Crime No. 410 of 2025; release on furnishing personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions regarding non-tampering, cooperation in trial and no criminal activity. ¶12

Abhishek Jatav vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Abhishek Jatav, arraigned in Case Crime No. 410 of 2025 under Sections 2 & 3 of the U.P. Gangsters Act (P.S. Muradnagar, District Ghaziabad), should be enlarged on bail during the pendency of trial.

¶9

Court's answer

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

The applicant is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to conditions including non-tampering with prosecution evidence/witnesses, sincere cooperation in trial without adjournments, and abstention from criminal activity.

¶12

Key takeaways

Breach of any of the bail conditions shall be a ground for cancellation of bail; identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties to be verified by the court concerned before bonds are accepted.ratio¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail — U.P. Gangsters Act, 1986 (Sections 2 & 3) — Allahabad High Court (Krishan Pahal, J.) allowed the bail application of Abhishek Jatav in Case Crime No. 410 of 2025, P.S. Muradnagar, District Ghaziabad, without expressing any opinion on the merits. Prosecution was founded on two criminal cases shown in the gang chart, in both of which the applicant had already been enlarged on bail; he was not alleged to be a previous convict and was in custody since 02.08.2025. Release directed on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, with conditions against tampering with evidence/intimidating witnesses, seeking adjournments, and indulging in criminal activity; breach of conditions to be a ground for cancellation of bail. Decision dated September 23, 2025.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31737 of 2025

Abhishek Jatav

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Sunil Kumar Singh, Upasna Verma
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 67

¶6

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶7

List has been revised.

¶8

Heard Sri Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Pranshu Kumar, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶9

Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 410 of 2025, under Sections 2 & 3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station - Muradnagar, District - Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial.

¶10

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act has been launched against the applicant on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not a member of any gang. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 2.8.2025 and in case, he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with trial.

¶11

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶12

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed . Let the applicant - Abhishek Jatav , involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶13

BAIL No. 31737 of 2025

¶14

¶15

i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶16

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶18

September 23, 2025 Siddhant

¶19

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Abhishek Jatav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Jatav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kapil vs State of U.P.

Mudassir vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Abhishek Kumar Singh vs State of U.P.

Rautan Singh vs State of U.P.

Ravi vs State of U.P.

Sumit vs State of U.P.