Harishchandra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Allahabad HC25 Nov 2025BAIL/2309/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail allowed on parity grounds where co-accused already granted bail, applicant has no criminal antecedents and has been in jail since 17.06.2024. FIR under Sections 302, 323, 504, 34 IPC. Conditions: personal bond, two sureties of Rs.20,000 each, no tampering, attend hearings.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each with conditions ¶¶15

Harishchandra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2309 of 2025

Harishchandra

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

¶7

				.....	Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ashok Tiwari,	Kumar Sin Savita Jain	gh,	Ashish	Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A., Sushant	Ashutosh Prakash	Sh	ukla,	Kunwar

¶8

Court No. - 12

¶9

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

¶10

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶11

2 . The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.348 of 2024, under Sections 302, 323, 504, 34 IPC, Police Station Ramnagar, District Barabanki.

¶12

3 . It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the co-accused Kidhi Lal and Bhupendra have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 15.10.2025 and 30.10.2025.

¶13

4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶14

5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who has been enlarged on bail coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 17.06.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶15

6. Let the applicant Harishchandra be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court

¶16

BAIL No. 2309 of 2025

¶17

¶18

concerned with the following conditions:

¶19

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶20

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶21

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶22

(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)

¶23

November 25, 2025

¶24

akverma

¶25

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Harishchandra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harishchandra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rijwan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Tarun Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Rahul Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. of U.P. Lko.

Reeta Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief / Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Revenue, Lko. and Others

Mahesh Tiwari @ Shivam vs the State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Vinod Kumar Upadhyay vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.