Disposed¶5

Rihan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC7 May 2025BAIL/2210/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2210 of 2025; applicant Rihan v. State of U.P. & 3 Others; Justice Krishan Pahal; interim order dated 22.1.2025; ossification test; ascertainment of age of victim; medical board by Chief Medical Officer Sambhal; police to assist CMO; Learned A.G.A. directions; Registrar (Compliance) communication within 48 hours via Chief Judicial Magistrate; put up fresh 13.2.2025; case not tied up or part heard.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; interim administrative and compliance directions issued, with the bail application to be put up afresh on 13.2.2025 before the appropriate Bench. ¶5

Rihan vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No substantive relief; interim administrative and compliance directions issued, with the bail application to be put up afresh on 13.2.2025 before the appropriate Bench.

¶5

Issue for consideration

Ascertainment of the victim's age by ossification test, conducted through a medical board to be constituted by the Chief Medical Officer, Sambhal, before further consideration of the bail application.

¶2

Court's answer

The Chief Medical Officer, Sambhal is directed to constitute a medical board to conduct an ossification test so as to ascertain the age of the victim, and a certified photocopy of the report shall be produced before this Court on the next date of listing.

¶2

Ratio / Principle

If the ossification test report is not submitted on the next date of listing, the Chief Medical Officer, Sambhal shall appear in person before the Court.

¶2

Key takeaways

The police authorities are directed to assist the concerned Chief Medical Officer.ratio¶3
The Learned A.G.A. is directed to look over the matter and to direct the State Authorities to have the ossification test of the victim conducted.ratio¶4
The matter is to be put up afresh on 13.2.2025 before the appropriate Bench, together with the certified photocopy of the ossification test report.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Krishan Pahal, J.), interim order dated 22.1.2025 on Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2210 of 2025 (Rihan v. State of U.P. & 3 Ors.): consideration of the bail application deferred pending ascertainment of the victim's age. Chief Medical Officer, Sambhal directed to constitute a medical board to conduct an ossification test of the victim, the certified photocopy of the report to be produced on the next date of listing (matter to be put up fresh on 13.2.2025 before the appropriate Bench), failing submission whereof the C.M.O. is to appear in person. Police authorities directed to assist the concerned C.M.O.; Learned A.G.A. to look over the matter and direct the State Authorities for the test; Registrar (Compliance) to communicate the order to the C.M.O. through the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate within 48 hours for intimation and compliance; the case shall not be treated as tied up or part heard to this Bench.

Rihan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rihan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Baba Malkit Singh @ Amreek vs State of U.P.

Khurshid vs State of U.P.

Surendra Singh and Anothers vs State of U.P.

Munsad @ Pahalwan @ Aashu vs State of U.P.

Mannu Bhola vs State of U.P.

Amitabh Srivastava Alias Dr. Amitabh Kumar Srivastava vs State of U.P.