Allowed¶17

Khurshid v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 May 2025BAIL/10592/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail allowed; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10592 of 2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:72449; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.; decided 6.5.2025; applicant Khurshid; case crime no. 321/2024; Sections 305, 331(4), 317(2), 317(4) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; parity with co-accused (bail application no. 40642/2024, order dated 23.11.2024); custody since 05.09.2024; personal bond and two sureties; conditions - no tampering with evidence, no threat to complainant, cooperation in trial, no misuse of liberty, no influencing witnesses; no opinion expressed on merits.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the enumerated conditions. ¶17

Khurshid vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Applicant released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the enumerated conditions.

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Khurshid, arraigned in case crime no. 321/2024 under Sections 305, 331(4), 317(2), 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, should be released on bail.

¶5

Court's answer

In view of the discussions above, the Court considered it appropriate that the applicant be released on bail.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the applicant was directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶11

Key takeaways

Release on bail was made subject to conditions: (i) not to tamper with the evidence during trial; (ii) not to threaten, harass or injure the complainant; (iii) to appear before the court as and when required and cooperate in the trial; (iv) not to misuse the liberty of bail nor commit any offence of a similar nature; and (v) not to make any inducement, threat or promise to witnesses acquainted with the facts.ratio¶12
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court found suitable grounds for release of the applicant on bail.ratio¶9

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:72449; order dated 6.5.2025) allowed the bail application of Khurshid, arraigned in case crime no. 321/2024 under Sections 305, 331(4), 317(2), 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (police station/district not legible in the record). The applicant, in custody since 05.09.2024, sought bail on parity with a co-accused whose bail application (no. 40642/2024) was dealt with by this Court by order dated 23.11.2024, and undertook to cooperate in the trial and abide by such conditions as the Court may impose. Learned A.G.A. opposed bail on the ground of the accused's criminal antecedents. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the Court found suitable grounds for release and admitted the applicant to bail on a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions: (i) no tampering with evidence during trial; (ii) no threat, harassment or injury to the complainant; (iii) appearance as and when required and cooperation in trial; (iv) no misuse of bail liberty and no commission of any offence of similar nature; and (v) no inducement, threat or promise to witnesses.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72449

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10592 of 2025 Applicant :- Khurshid Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Indrakesh Kumar Sharma,Tarun Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

वररममनदमणणणकपककररजममनरपमररनमपत, आववदकखखररदककओरसवमख०अ०सस० 321/2024 अनरर धमरम 305, 331(4), 317(2), 317(4) भमररतयनयमयससहहरम, रमनम घखघखलत, जजलममहरमजरसजममजममनरपरमखककरनवहवरखपसरखरहकयमरयमहह।

¶6

आववदककवहवदमनअजधवकमएवसहवदमनअपररमसककयअजधवकमककसखनमररम पतमवलतकमपरररतलनहकयम।

¶7

आववदककवहवदमनअजधवकमनवरकरपसरखरहकयमहकआववदकककइसपकररममरलर एवसफजरढसरसवझझठमफससमयमरयमहह।पशनररमममलवकवसहअहभयखकहदरमदककजममनर, जममनरआववदनपतसस० 40642/2024 ममइसनयमयमलयकवअनयनयमयपतठकवआदवर हद० 23.11.2024 कवदमरमसवतकमरककजमचखककहह। आववदककमवमदभतसहअहभयखककव सममनहह।इसजलएआववदकभतसहअहभयखकसवसममनरमकवआधमरपरजममनरपमनवकम अजधकमरतहह।उनकमकरनहहहकआववदकककओरसवयहआशवमसनहदयमरयमहहहकवह कमनझनककपहकयमममसहयकरकरनवकवजलएरहयमरहहऔरजबभतआवशयकरमहकरतवह ईममनदमरतसवहवचमररनयमयमलयकवसमकखखदककउपलबधकरमएरमऔरउनसभतरररसकक सवतकमरकरनवकवजलएभतरहयमरहहजकनयमयमलयउसपरअजधरकहपरकरवरत।आववदकहनदरष हहररमवहइसपकररममहद० 05.09.2024 सवकमरमरमरममहनरदहह, इसजलएआववदककक जममनरपरछकडहदयमजमय।

¶8

हवदमनअपररमसककयअजधवकमनवअहभयखककवहवदमनअजधवकमकवरकरसकमपबल हवरकधकररवहहएरकरपसरखरहकयमहकअहभयखकदमरमकमरररअपरमधरसभतरपककहरकमहह, इसजलएअहभयखकककजममनरपरनछकडमजमय।

¶9

आववदककवहवदमनअजधवकमकवरकरसकवपररपवकयममपतमवलतपरउपलबधसमरवमन रथययएवसपररणसरहरययकमसमगरपसवअवलककनकरनवकवबमद, सबझरयककपककहरऔर हकसतभतठकसहवरकधमतमकसममगतककअनखपणसरहरएवसउपलबधसममगतसवछवडछमडकक ससभमवनमनहकनवकवरथयककदवखरवहहएमवरतरमयममआववदकककजममनरपरमखककरनवकम उपयखकआधमरहह।

¶10

अरतवमदकवरखर-दकषपरहबनमककईहटपपरतहकएहहएआववदकककउपरककवहर

¶11

अपरमधममससबसजधरनयमयमलयककससरखहषपरवयहकररबसध-पतएवसउसतधनरमहरकवदक पहरभझपसरखरकरनवपरहनमनजलजखररररसकवसमरजममनरपरछकडहदयमजमय।

¶12

आववदकहवववचनमयमपरतकरकवददरमनअहभयकजनसमकययकवसमरछवडछमडनहह करवरम।

¶13

आववदकअहभयकजनसमहकययवपतहडरम/ हरकमयरकरमरककणरमयवरम/धमकमयवरम नहह।

¶14

आववदकनयमयमलयकवआदवरयकमपमलनकरवरम, वहपरतकरकवददरमनहबनमककई अनमवशयकसररनजलएहनयरहरजरपरनयमयमलयममउपणसररहकरमररमपरतकर ममईममनदमरतसवसहयकरकरवरम।

¶15

आववदकजममनरपरररहमहकनवकवबमदजममनरककसवरसतरमकमदखरपयकरनहत करवरमऔरहकसतभतआपरमजधकरहरहवजधममजलपनहहहकरमनककईअपरमजधक ककतयकरवरम।

¶16

आववदकपतयकयमअपतयकरपसवमममलवकवरथययसवपररहचरहकसतभतवयहकयम पखजलसअजधकमररययककककईपलकभनयमधमककनहहदवरमनहतउनसवककईवमयदम करवरम, जजसकवकमररउनहमनयमयमलयममरथययककउजमररकरनवसवहवरररहनम पणवड।

¶17

उपरककरररसममसवहकसतकवउलसघनकवमममलवमम, परतकरनयमयमलयआववदककक जममनरहनयममनखसमररदकरनवककसवरसतहह।

¶18

Order Date :- 6.5.2025 CP.sahani

¶19

Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Khurshid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khurshid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rahul Kashyap Alias Raju vs State of U.P.

Smt. Samudari vs State of U.P. and Another

Ujaifa vs State of U.P.

Smt. Manju Verma vs State of U.P.

Ashok Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nitesh Chauhan vs State of U.P. and 3 Others