Bail sought in a case of fatal assault allegedly arising from a property dispute under BNS provisions. The court noted general allegations, bail granted to two similarly placed co-accused, custody since December and no prior antecedents, and enlarged the applicant on bail on the ground of parity with standard conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1996 of 2025
Vineet
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajat Pratap Singh, Askari Husain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ajeet Kumar Singh
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
BAIL No. 1996 of 2025
2
sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
November 4, 2025
V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, in custody with co-accused already granted bail on similar allegations arising from a property dispute, was entitled to bail on parity?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vineet
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
