A criminal miscellaneous bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the trial had concluded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11084 of 2024
Shiv Kumar @ Khadahe @ Khadail
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prince Singh, Dinesh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1 . None has appeared on behalf of the applicant even in the revised list.
2 . It has been informed that the trial has concluded and the application has rendered infructuous.
3 . It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
December 5, 2025
akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application remains maintainable after the conclusion of trial?
Shiv Kumar @ Khadahe @ Khadail
State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
