The bail application was dismissed as it had become infructuous following the conclusion of the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6037 of 2024
Mahendra Alias Mahendra Nishad
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. A.C.S / Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar Mishra, Ajay Kumar Singh, Kaushalendra K. Tripathi, Pramod Kumar, Ravindra Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sachin Pandey Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
It is informed that the trial has concluded, as such, the application has rendered infructuous.
Present application is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
December 4, 2025
nishant
Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mahendra Alias Mahendra Nishad
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
