Rahul Kashyap Alias Raju vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Rahul Kashyap Alias Raju vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Conditional bail granted to Rahul Kashyap alias Raju: release on bail upon execution of the requisite bond and surety/solvency documentation, subject to the five conditions at ¶¶14–19; the closing passage (¶20) leaves the competent court at liberty in the event of breach of any condition (its precise effect not clearly legible).

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant — in custody since 14.01.2025 in connection with Case/FIR No. 07/2025 under ss. 303(2), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — should be released on bail pending the proceedings. +1 more

Court's answer

On hearing the contending parties and surveying the material available on record together with the circumstances pointed out, the Court found — prima facie and until the contrary is shown — no useful ground for keeping the applicant in custody.

Ratio / Principle

Declining to enter into the wider merits of the allegations against the applicant, and weighing the facts recited and the nature of the allegations, the Court directed the applicant's release on bail upon furnishing of the requisite bond and surety/solvency attestations before the court.

Key takeaways

The release is conditional: five conduct conditions bind the applicant (¶¶14–19), beginning with an undertaking that he shall not commit any offence of a similar nature during the continuance of the proceedings; in case of breach of any condition, the competent court was left at liberty in respect of the applicant.ratio¶¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Court No. 70) — Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.; order dated 22.8.2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:144929. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11924 of 2025, Rahul Kashyap alias Raju v. State of U.P.: the applicant, in custody since 14.01.2025 in Case/FIR No. 07/2025 under ss. 303(2), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (police station/district names illegible), sought bail; his counsel pleaded false implication, questioned the police course (incl. an alleged s. 103 Sanhita reference) and offered cooperation in trial, while the State opposed release citing alleged past offences. Hearing both sides and scanning the record, and without adjudging the wider merits of the allegations, the Court held that continued custody served no useful purpose and allowed conditional bail upon furnishing of the requisite bond and surety/solvency attestations, subject to five conditions: (i) no similar offence during the pendency of proceedings; (ii) no wrongdoing towards the complainant and connected persons (purport partly legible); (iii) obedience to court directions, appearance when specifically required and cooperation in the ongoing process; (iv) a peace/good-conduct condition (purport partly legible); and (v) disclosure of address and mobile number to the concerned police officer with prompt reporting of any change, breach of the undertaking attracting consequences. On breach of any condition the competent court was left at liberty regarding the applicant (exact effect — release or renewed custody — not clearly legible). CAUTION: the Hindi body text is severely OCR-garbled; statutory attributions and condition purports should be verified against the original before citation.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144929

Court No. - 70

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11924 of 2025

Applicant :- Rahul Kashyap Alias Raju Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Agni Pal Singh,Pratima Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

वररममनदमणणणकपककररजममनरपमररनमपत, आववदकककओरसव मम०अ०सस० 07/2025 अनरर धमरम 303(2), 317(2), 317(4) भमररतयनयमय ससहहरम, रमनमकनरलरसज, जजलमकमनपमरनररममजममनरपरममककरनवहवरम पसरमरहकयमरयमहह।

आववदककवहवदमनअजधवकमएवसहवदमनअपरशमसककयअजधवकमककसमनम ररमपतमवलतकमपररशतलनहकयम।

आववदककवहवदमनअजधवकमदमरमपपरकशपरपतदमजखलहकयमरयम, इसव पतमवलतपररखमजमय।

आववदककवहवदमनअजधवकमनवरकरपसरमरहकयमहकआववदकककइस पकररममरलरएवसफजरढसरसवझपठमफससमयमरयमहह।पशनररपकररमम आववदकपरमकटरसमइहकलचकरतकरनवकमआकवपआरकहपरहकयमरयमहह, हकसरम पमससहरकरथययहहहहकआववदकपरमसपचनमररपकटरममनमहमरनहहहह।पमजलस दमरमआववदकसवखमलवजनसरलसवकजररचकरतककमकटरसमइहकलकक बरममदरतदशमरयतरयतहह, हकसरमइसबरममदरतकमककईजनसमकतयमसवसरत समकतनहहहह।इससवपररलहकरहहहक पमजलसदमरमधमरम 103 भमररतयनमरररक समरकमससहहरमकमअऩमपमलननहहहकयमरयमहह।पमननउनकमकरनहहहक आववदकककओरसवयहआशवमसनहदयमरयमहहहकवहकमनपनककपहकयममम सहयकरकरनवकवजलएरहयमरहहऔरजबभतआवशयकरमहकरतवहईममनदमरतसव

हवचमररनयमयमलयकवसमकखमदककउपलबधकरमएरमऔरउनसभतशररसकक सवतकमरकरनवकवजलएभतरहयमरहहजकनयमयमलयउसपरअजधरकहपरकरवरत। आववदकहनदरषहहररमवहइसपकररममहद० 14.01.2025 सवकमरमरमरमम हनरदहह, इसजलएआववदकककजममनरपरछकडहदयमजमय।

हवदमनअपरशमसककयअजधवकमनवअहभयमककवहवदमनअजधवकमकवरकरस कमपबलहवरकधकररवहहएरकरपसरमरहकयमहकअहभयमकदमरमकमरररअपरमध रसभतरपककहरकमहह, इसजलएअहभयमकककजममनरपरनछकडमजमय।

आववदककवहवदमनअजधवकमकवरकरसकवपररपवकयममपतमवलतपरउपलबध समरवमनरथययएवसपररणसरहरययकमसमगरपसवअवलककनकरनवकवबमद, सबपरयककपककहरऔरहकसतभतठकसहवरकधमतमकसममगतककअनमपणसरहरएवस उपलबधसममगतसवछवडछमडककससभमवनमनहकनवकवरथयककदवखरवहहएमवरत रमयममआववदकककजममनरपरममककरनवकमउपयमकआधमरहह।

अरनवमदकवरमर-दकषपरहबनमककईहटपपरतहकएहहएआववदकककउपरकक वहर अपरमधममससबसजधरनयमयमलयककससरमहषपरवयहकररबसध-पतएवसउसत धनरमहशकवदकपहरभपपसरमरकरनवपरहनमनजलजखरशररसकवसमरजममनरपर छकडहदयमजमय।

आववदकहवववचनमयमपरतकरकवददरमनअहभयकजनसमकययकवसमर छवडछमडनहहकरवरम।

आववदक अहभयकजन समहकयय व पतहडरम/ हशकमयरकरमर कक णरमयवरम/धमकमयवरमनहह।

आववदकनयमयमलयकवआदवशयकमपमलनकरवरम, वहपरतकरकवददरमन हबनमककईअनमवशयकसररनजलएहनयरहरजरपरनयमयमलयमम उपणसररहकरमररमपरतकरममईममनदमरतसवसहयकरकरवरम।

आववदकजममनरपरररहमहकनवकवबमदजममनरककसवरसतरमकम दमरपयकरनहतकरवरमऔरहकसतभतआपरमजधकरहरहवजधममजलपनहह हकरमनककईअपरमजधकककतयकरवरम।

आववदकपतयकयमअपतयकरपसवमममलवकवरथययसवपररहचरहकसत भतवयहकयमपमजलसअजधकमररययककककईपलकभनयमधमककनहहदवरम

नहतउनसवककईवमयदमकरवरम, जजसकवकमररउनहमनयमयमलयममरथयय ककउजमररकरनवसवहवरररहनमपणवड।

उपरककशररसममसवहकसतकवउलसघनकवमममलवमम, परतकरनयमयमलय आववदकककजममनरहनयममनमसमररदकरनवककसवरसतहह।

Order Date :- 22.8.2025 CP.sahani

Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad