Allowed¶13

Manoj v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC23 May 2025ABAIL/4247/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Section 438 Cr.P.C.; Manoj v. State of U.P. and Another; Allahabad High Court; Court No. 70; neutral citation 2025:AHC:106565; Application No. 4247 of 2024; FIR/case no. 226 of 2023; Sections 307, 504, 427, 34 IPC; arrest warrant on credible information; no fresh incident; undertaking to appear and cooperate; Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 1 SCC 694 (relied upon); application allowed/granted; order dated 7.7.2025; Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application of applicant Manoj under S. 438 Cr.P.C. accepted/granted. ¶13

Manoj vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Anticipatory bail application of applicant Manoj under S. 438 Cr.P.C. accepted/granted.

¶13

Issue for consideration

Whether anticipatory bail under S. 438 Cr.P.C. should be granted to applicant Manoj in relation to case/FIR no. 226 of 2023 (Sections 307, 504, 427, 34, per the abbreviated Hindi penal-code reference).

¶3

Court's answer

Recalling Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, the court records the Supreme Court's guidance that courts deciding anticipatory bail applications must weigh, among other things, the accused's antecedents and comparable material considerations before arriving at a decision (Hindi wording OCR-degraded).

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The court records that, in this matter, the accusatory/arrest step against the accused rested on wholly credible information; this circumstance formed part of the court's assessment (Hindi wording OCR-degraded).

¶12

Key takeaways

No fresh incident/case is stated to have arisen against the applicant notwithstanding the enforcement step taken against him (Hindi wording OCR-degraded).ratio¶8
The applicant undertook that whenever required he would present himself before the honourable higher court and render full assistance/cooperation, and this assurance was taken into account (Hindi wording OCR-degraded).ratio¶8
Upon weighing the circumstances, the court accepted (granted) the applicant's anticipatory bail application.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Court No. 70), Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J. — Anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. (Application No. 4247 of 2024) by applicant Manoj, arising in relation to case/FIR no. 226 of 2023 under Sections 307, 504, 427 and 34 (abbreviated Hindi penal-code reference). Guided by Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, the court weighed the material circumstances: the accusatory/arrest step rested on wholly credible information, yet no fresh incident was recorded against the applicant, who undertook to appear before and fully cooperate with the court whenever required. The court accordingly accepted the anticipatory bail application. Order dated 7.7.2025; neutral citation 2025:AHC:106565. NOTE: the underlying judgment text is in Hindi and heavily OCR-degraded; readings marked accordingly.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106565

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4247 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Manoj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amzad Rza Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

वररममनदमणणणकपककररअगगमजममनरपमररनमपतआववदकमननज ककओर सव मम०अ०सस० 226/2023 अनरर धमरम 307, 504, 427, 34 भम०दस०गव०, रमनमससदमररनरर, सजलमससदमररनररममअगगमजममनरपर ममककरनवहवरमपसरमरगकयमरयमहह।

¶7

आववदककवगवदमनअसधवकमएवसगवदमनअपरशमसककयअसधवकमकनसमनम ररमपतमवललकमपररशललनगकयम।

¶8

आववदककवगवदमनअसधवकमनवरकरपसरमरगकयमगकआववदकगनदरषहह, उसवउपरनकधमरमओसममदवषवशरसरवपरवशमनकरनवककगनयरसवआसलपगकयम रयमहह, उसवआशसकमहहगकउसवउपरनकवगर मममलवममगररफरमरगकयमजम सकरमहह, जबगकउसकवगवरदकनईगवशवसनलयसमकयनहहहह।आववदकदमरम पमरगमककममदगश उपरनकधमरमओसकमअपरमधकमरररनहहगकयमरयमहह। यहमसपमससगरकरथययहभलहहगकअगभयनरलकनगकसलपकमरकककनईचनटनहह आयलहह, बणलकआववदककनइसमममलवममर स जशननमगमरगकयमरयमहह।पमनन आववदकककओरसवयहभलआशवमसनगदयमरयमहहगकवहकमन ककपगकयम ममसहयनरकरनवकवसलएरहयमरहहऔरजबभलआवशयकरमहनरलवहईममनदमरल सवनयमयमलयकवसमकखमदकनउपलबधकरमएरमऔरउनसभलशररसकन सवलकमरकरनवकवसलएभलरहयमरहहजननयमयमलयउसपरअसधरनगपरकरवरल।

¶9

गवदमनअपरशमसककयअसधवकमदमरमयहरकरपसरमरगकयमरयमगक अगभयमकदमरमकमरररअपरमधरसभलरपककगरकमहहररमइसमममलमममअगभयमक

¶10

कवगवरदपयमरपसमकयकवआधमरपरआरनपपतदमसखलगकयमजमचमकमहह ररमअगभयमकककभनगमकमअगभयनजनसमकलररदमरमअगभकसररहह।अगभयमक दमरमअनयसहअगभयमकररकवसमरगमलकरकमरररअपरमधरसभलरहह।इससलए अगभयमककनअगगमजममनरपरममकगकयवजमनवकमकनईऔगचतयपरलरनहह हनरहमहह।अरनअगभयमककमयहअगगमजममनरआववदनपतगनरसरगकयम जमय।

¶11

यहकहमजमसकरमहहगक Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 कवमममलवममममननलयउचचरम नयमयमलयनवममनमहहगकअगगमजममनरपरगनररयकररवसमयनयमयमलयकन आरनपककपककगरऔररसभलररम, अगभयमककमपनवरवकत, अगभयमककवनयमयसव भमरनवककससभमवनमपरगवचमरकरनमचमगहएररमनयमयमलयकनअगभयमककव गवरदउपलबधससपनररसममगलकमसमवधमनलपनवरकमनलयमसकनकरनमचमगहएररम अगभयमकककसटलकभनगमकमकनभलधयमनममरखनमचमगहए।

¶12

वररममनमममलवममअगगमजममनरससबसधलगवसधकवसरमगपरससदमसरतकन धयमनममरखरवहहएऔरपककमरतकवगवदमनअसधवकमओसकवकरनत, आरनपतकक पककगर, आववदकककभनगमकमऔरमममलवकवसभलरथयतएवसपररणसरगरयतकन धयमनममरखरवहहए, चनसगकइसमममलमममअगभयमककवगवरदपयमरपसमकयकव आधमरपरआरनपपतदमसखलगकयमजमचमकमहह।इससलएमममलवकवरमर-दनष परगबनमकनईगवचमरवयकगकएयहअगगमजममनरआववदनपतसवलकमरगकए जमनवयनगयनहहहह, रदनमसमरआववदककमअगगमजममनरआववदनपत असवलकमरगकयमजमरमहह।

¶13

रदनमसमर, इसअगगमजममनरआववदनपतकनगनरसर गकयमजमरमहह।

¶14

इसवमदममयगदकनईअसरररमआदवशहन, रनवहसवरनसममपसमझमजमए। 9. कमयमरलयकनगनदरगशरगकयमजमरमहहगकइसआदवशककएकपगरसलगप अगवलमबससब स धरगवचमररनयमयमलयकवभवजनमसमगनणशचरकरम।

¶15

Order Date :- 7.7.2025 CP.sahani

¶16

Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manoj v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rahul Sinha vs State of U.P.

Subhash Chandra Kashyap vs State of Up and Another

Avaneesh and Another vs State of Up and 3 Others

Raviraj Kushwaha vs State of Up

Aanand Kumar vs State of Up 3 Others

Ujaifa vs State of U.P.