Application under Section 483 seeking a direction for expeditious disposal of a pending complaint case under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC at Sultanpur was disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to conclude the proceedings as expeditiously as possible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 694 of 2025
Shrimanti
.....Applicant(s) Versus The Court Of Civil Judge Parvar Khand I./A.C.J.M. Sultanpur And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
The instant application has been preferred for the following main relief:-
"I. Issue a suitable, order or direction commanding The Court of Civil Judge (Pravar Khand) I / A.C.J.M. Sultanpur i.e.Respondent No. 1, to decide the present Complainant Case No. 1820/2023, "Shrimanti vs Govinde and Others.", U/Ss. 323,504,506 Ι.P.C, P.S. Jaisinghpur District - Sultanpur, expeditiously within such period as may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court accordance with law in the interest of justice."
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, most
A483 No. 694 of 2025
2
expeditiously, as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671 , the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of.
(Saurabh Lavania,J.)
August 29, 2025 ML/-
Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Should the trial court be directed to expedite disposal of Complaint Case No. 1820/2023 under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and AnotherRelied on¶13
Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248 · Who else cites this
Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of BiharRelied on¶13
Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81 · Who else cites this
Kadra Pahadiya and Others v. State of BiharRelied on¶13
Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Shrimanti
The Court of Civil Judge Parvar Khand I./A.C.J.M. Sultanpur
Opposite Party No. 2
Opposite Party No. 3
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
