Dismissal for want of prosecution / non-appearance of applicant's counsel at revised listing; Section 482 application not pressed; Ayodhya Prasad v. State of U.P. and Another; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Vikram D. Chauhan, J.; decided November 25, 2025; no merits adjudication, no cases cited, no quantum.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9784 of 2024
Ayodhya Prasad
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, Mohit Kumar Umrao, Ramesh Chandra Nigam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 76
HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
The present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Vikram D. Chauhan,J.)
November 25, 2025
Bhaskar
Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
