Dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of applicants' counsel on revision of list; Section 482 application not pressed; Dayashankar and 6 others v. State of U.P. and another; Allahabad High Court, Court No. 76; Vikram D. Chauhan, J.; November 25, 2025; Application U/S 482 No. 9913 of 2024.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9913 of 2024
Dayashankar And 6 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Piyush Patel, Pradeep Kumar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : Dinesh Kumar Pandey, G.A. |
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
The present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Vikram D. Chauhan,J.)
November 25, 2025
Bhaskar
Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
