An application under Section 482 was argued at length before being withdrawn by counsel; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn and directed the office to communicate the order to the trial court.
Application dismissed as withdrawn on applicant's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8805 of 2025
Ashish Kumar Mishra
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
(Rajeev Singh,J.)
November 17, 2025
Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashish Kumar Mishra
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Another
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
