A writ petition against U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) was called; no one appeared for the petitioner while the State's Standing Counsel was present. The court merely listed the matter for further hearing on January 19, 2026, without deciding any issue or granting any interim relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 8159 of 2024
Praveen Maheshwari
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Dir. Lko. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor
Court No. - 21
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
List this matter on January 19, 2026.
(Prashant Kumar,J.)
November 15, 2025
Saurabh Yadav/-
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Praveen Maheshwari
U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Dir. Lko.
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
