Aman Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:7293

Court No. - 76

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39332 of 2024

Applicant :- Aman Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, and perused the entire record.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to quash the cognizance order dated 11.10.2024 and chargesheet dated 10.09.2024 as well as entire proceedings of S.S.T. No. 975 of 2024, CNR No.UPMO010086292024, titled State v. Aman Kumar and others, arising out of Case Crime No.50 of 2024, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Thakurdwara, District Moradabad, pending in the Court of Special Judge, Gangsters Act/Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.6, Moradabad.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicants submits the provisions of the Gangster Act have been invoked against the applicants based on a single base case shown in the Gang Chart, i.e. case crime no. 333 of 2023, under Section 379, 411 IPC, registered at P.S. Thakurdwar, District Kaushambi, in which the applicants have already been acquitted by the trial court. Therefore, there is no basis to continue the instant proceedings. Hence, the proceedings of the instant case are liable to be quashed.

¶9

Per-contra , learned A.G.A. has opposed the application but

¶10

could not dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicants.

¶11

In the instant case, a perusal of the record shows that the proceedings under Gangster Act were initiated against the applicants mainly on the basis of a sole case, in which the applicants have already been acquitted by the trial court. At this stage, it would be pertinent to mention that recently, in case of Farhana Versus State of U. P., SLP (Crl.) No.437 of 2023 , decided on 19.2.2024 , the Supreme Court held as under:

¶12

"12. From a bare perusal of Section 2(b)(i) of the Gangsters Act, it would become apparent that the person alleged to be the member of the gang should be found indulging in anti-social activities which would be covered under the offences punishable under Chapters XVI, or XVII or XXII IPC. There is no dispute that the case set up by the prosecution against the appellants insofar as the offences under the Gangsters Act are concerned, is limited to Section 2(b)(i) reproduced supra and none of the other clauses of the provision have been pressed into service for the proposed prosecution.

¶13

13. Needless to say that for framing a charge for the offence under the Gangsters Act and for continuing the prosecution of the accused under the above provisions, the prosecution would be required to clearly state that the appellants are being prosecuted for any one or more offences covered by antisocial activities as defined under Section 2(b).

¶14

14. There being no dispute that in the proceedings of the sole FIR registered against the appellants for the offences under Chapter XVII IPC being Crime Case No. 173 of 2019, the appellants stand exonerated with the quashing of the said FIR by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by exercising the powers under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, vide order dated 3rd March, 2023 passed in Application No. 7228 of 2023.

¶15

15. Hence, the very foundation for continuing the prosecution of the appellants under the provisions of the Gangsters Act stands struck off and as

¶16

a consequence, the continued prosecution of the appellants for the said offence is unjustified and tantamounts to abuse of the process of Court.

¶17

16. As a consequence of the discussion made herein above, the impugned orders dated 14th November, 2022 and 6th December, 2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad are quashed and set aside. Resultantly, the impugned FIR being Crime Case No.424 of 2022 for offence punishable under Section 3(1) of the Gangsters Act, registered at Police Station- Bhognipur, District- Kanpur Dehat and all the proceedings sought to be taken thereunder against the appellants are hereby quashed.

¶18

17. The appeals are allowed accordingly"

¶19

From the aforesaid pronouncement of the Supreme Court, it appears that in the aforesaid case the proceedings under Gangster Act were initiated on the basis of two criminal cases, which were quashed by the High Court, and it was observed by the Supreme Court that since the very foundation of continuing the prosecution of the appellants under the provisions of Gangster Act stand struck off and consequently continuing prosecution of the appellant for offence under Gangster Act is unjustified and tantamount to the abuse of the process of the Court. The said case law is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. In the instant matter also, the proceedings of both the cases, on the basis of which impugned proceedings were initiated, have been quashed and thus, the very basis of the impugned proceedings stands vanished and receded. Here it would be relevant to mention that there is no such evidence of any specific incident that the applicant was found indulging in anti-social activities covered under Chapter XVI, XVII and XXII, so as to bring them within the purview of Section 2 (b) (i) of the Gangster Act.

¶20

In view of the aforesaid, particularly considering the fact that

¶21

the applicants have been acquitted in a single base case, on the basis of which the proceedings under the Gangster Act had been initiated. Hence, the instant criminal proceedings against the applicants for an offence under the Gangster Act are unjustified and tantamount to the abuse of the process of the Court. Hence, the impugned proceedings are liable to be quashed.

¶22

Accordingly, the cognizance order dated 11.10.2024 and charge sheet dated 10.09.2024, as well as the entire proceedings of S.S.T. No. 975 of 2024, CNR No.UPMO010086292024, titled State v. Aman Kumar and others, arising out of Case Crime No.50 of 2024, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Thakurdwara, District Moradabad, pending in the Court of Special Judge, Gangsters Act/Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.6, Moradabad, against the applicants, are hereby quashed.

¶23

Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed .

¶24

Order Date :- 16.1.2025 A. Tripathi

¶25

Justice Vinod Diwakar

¶26

Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Aman Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Annu Nayak and Another vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Smt. Juli and Another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Smt Ruhina and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Anil vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Chandni and Another vs State of Up and 5 Others

Nasrin and Another vs State of Up and 3 Others