Sushila v. the Addl. Comissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 8, Jaspreet Singh, J.; MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 709 of 2025; neutral citation 2025:AHC-LKO:13809; order dated 6.3.2025. Petitioner Sushila sought a direction to the Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal (respondent no.1) to hear and decide her interim relief application filed alongwith a pending revision, which had not been heard despite fixed dates. Court directed expeditious disposal of the interim relief application with full opportunity of hearing, no unnecessary adjournments, preferably next date or within three weeks thereafter; no adjudication on merits; petition disposed of. Counsel: Vimal Kumar and Govind Kumar Chourasia for petitioner; C.S.C. and Mohan Singh for respondents. Keywords: Article 227, revision, interim relief, delay, expeditious disposal, mandamus-type direction.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending application for interim relief after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, without unnecessary adjournments, preferably on the next date and, if not possible, within three weeks thereafter.