Disposed¶14

Badami Devi v. Board of Revenue U.P. at Lko. Thru. Member and 2 Others

Allahabad HC15 Jan 2025A227/65/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 petition; expeditious disposal of pending revision; Revision Case No.2205/2014 (Computerized R20140404002205); Section 219 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; Board of Revenue U.P.; Lucknow Bench; Jaspreet Singh J.; order dated 27.1.2025; 2025:AHC-LKO:5266; petitioner Badami Devi; no unnecessary adjournments; merits left to court below.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the pending Revision Case No.2205/2014 expeditiously, giving full opportunity of hearing and without unnecessary adjournments; no merits examined by this Court. ¶14

Badami Devi vs Board of Revenue U.P. at Lko… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5266

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 65 of 2025

¶4

Petitioner :- Badami Devi Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. At Lko. Thru. Member And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faiz Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶8

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 and 3 is dispensed with.

¶9

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Revision bearing Case No.2205/2014, Computerized Case No.R20140404002205, under Section 219 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶10

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid revision has not yet been decided.

¶11

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending revision, as aforesaid, most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible leaving it open for the parties concerned to get their case adjudicated as per law.

¶13

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the revision as per the evidence led by the parties concerned.

¶14

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Rakesh/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Badami Devi v. Board of Revenue U.P. at Lko. Thru. Member and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badami Devi v. Board of Revenue U.P. at Lko. Thru. Member and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Upma Singh vs U.P. State Road Transport Corporation through its Managing Director

Khadim India Limited Thru. Authorized Representative Tapas Kumar Chakraborty vs State of U.P. Thru. Director, Basic Education and another

Hari Shankar Singh and Another vs Anurag Pandey, Naib Tehsildar, Sadar, Gonda

Vijay Kumar @ Vijayee and 2 Others vs Smt. Narendar Kaur

Smt. Shashi Devi vs Satyam Singh

Gladys Basil Sharma vs Ravi Basil Sharma