Disposed

Badami Devi v. Board of Revenue U.P. at Lko. Thru. Member and 2 Others

Allahabad HC27 Jan 2025/65/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court hearing applied Article 227 of the Constitution to a writ petition seeking expedient disposal of a pending revenue revision under Section 219 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The Court, noting undue delays, directed the lower authorities to dispose of the revision expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments but without adjudicating on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the concerned authority to consider and decide the pending revision most expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments.

Badami Devi Vs Board of Revenue U.P. at Lko… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5266

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 65 of 2025

¶4

Petitioner :- Badami Devi Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. At Lko. Thru. Member And 2 Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Faiz Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶6

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶7

Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶9

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 and 3 is dispensed with.

¶10

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Revision bearing Case No.2205/2014, Computerized Case No.R20140404002205, under Section 219 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶11

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid revision has not yet been decided.

¶12

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending revision, as aforesaid, most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible leaving it open for the parties concerned to get their case adjudicated as per law.

¶14

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the revision as per the evidence led by the parties concerned.

¶15

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶16

Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Rakesh/-

¶17

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Badami Devi v. Board of Revenue U.P. at Lko. Thru. Member and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badami Devi v. Board of Revenue U.P. at Lko. Thru. Member and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Chhatthoo Prasad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. and Others

Krishan Devi Vs D.D.C.and Ors.

Shiv Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. through District Magistrate Gonda, and 8 Others

Santosh Pal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko and Others

Vibha Sarin vs Estate Late Ajay Sarin and Another

Sukhlal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Collector Lko. and Others