Dismissed¶12

M/S Modern Engineers Lko. Thru. Partner Sumer Kumar Agarwal v. Commercial Court NO.1 Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC7 Nov 2025A227/6362/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No.-6362 of 2025; M/S Modern Engineers (partner Sumer Kumar Agarwal) vs Commercial Court No.1 Lko. and another; counsel Sanjiv Srivastava; petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Justice Subhash Vidyarthi; decided November 7, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition under appropriate provision of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. ¶12

M/S Modern Engineers Lko. Thru. Partner Sumer Kumar Agarwal Vs… — Arbitration | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6362 of 2025

¶3

M/S Modern Engineers Lko. Thru. Partner Sumer Kumar Agarwal

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Commercial Court No.1 Lko. And Another

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Sanjiv Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:

¶9

Court No. - 17

¶10

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

¶11

Sri Sanjiv Srivastava, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press t he instant petition and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition under appropriate provision of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶12

Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.

¶13

(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)

¶14

November 7, 2025

¶15

Pradeep/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

M/S Modern Engineers Lko. Thru. Partner Sumer Kumar Agarwal v. Commercial Court NO.1 Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Modern Engineers Lko. Thru. Partner Sumer Kumar Agarwal v. Commercial Court NO.1 Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Neelam Devi Vs Smt. Brij Kunwari @ Shiv Kala

A-One Poly Pipes and Fittings (P) Ltd. thru. Authorized Signatory Mr. Sudip Kumar Jain and Another Vs Engineer In Chief (Mech), Irrigation Department, U.P. Sinchai Bhawan, Lucknow and Another

Society Shiksha Prasar Parishad Thru. Secy. Ravi Shankar Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Durgesh Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow and Ors.

Rakesh Sharma vs Central Bereau of Investigation Thru. CBI / Acb Lko.

Sardar Bhag Singh and 6 Others Vs U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry of Railway Baroda House New Delhi Thru. General Manager and 5 Others