Disposed¶14

Badlu v. State of U.P. Thru. Dist. Majestrate Barabanki Dist. Barabanki and 3 Others

Allahabad HC15 Sept 2025A227/5455/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Badlu v. State of U.P. (and 3 others); MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 5455 of 2025; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Pankaj Bhatia J.; challenge to ex-parte decree dated 03.04.2024 of Civil Judge Junior Division Ram Sanehi Ghat District Barabanki; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) remedy against ex-parte judgment; Article 227 writ interference declined; petitioner permitted to pursue legal remedies; petition disposed of; September 15, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner left at liberty to avail such legal remedies against the ex-parte decree as may be advised; no Article 227 interference granted. ¶14

Badlu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Dist. Majestrate… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5455 of 2025

Badlu

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Majestrate Barabanki Dist. Barabanki And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Dinesh Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Ram Karan Yadav

¶9

Court No. - 6

¶10

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

¶11

The present petition has been filed challenging an ex-parte decree dated 03.04.2024, passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ram Sanehi Ghat, DistrictBarabanki.

¶12

Considering that the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) specifies a remedy against an ex-parte judgment, no interference is called for under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

¶13

The petitioner is at liberty to avail such legal remedies as may be advised.

¶14

The petition is accordingly disposed of .

¶15

September 15, 2025 Haseen U.

¶16

(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Badlu v. State of U.P. Thru. Dist. Majestrate Barabanki Dist. Barabanki and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badlu v. State of U.P. Thru. Dist. Majestrate Barabanki Dist. Barabanki and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ramapati Maurya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. and 4 Others

U.P. Projects Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Auth. Signatory Lko. Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Tax and Registration Lko. and 3 Others

M/S Mahadev Construction Company Thru. Authorized Representative Shri Madaram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner State Tax U.P. Lko. and 2 Others

Shiv Bahadur Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.Panchayat Raj Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others

M/S Et Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Signatory Ms.Shiwanjali Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Infrastructure/Industrial Development and 3 Others

Pawan Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Revenue Govt. Lko. and 3 Others