Disposed

Shri Hunuman Mandir Masadih (Baba Bihari Das Ashram) Thru. Pandit Ram Chandar v. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Bahraich and 6 Others

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2025A227/5382/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Article 227 seeking expedited disposal of a 2012 regular suit pending before the Civil Judge, Bahraich. The Court directed the trial court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible without unnecessary adjournments and disposed of the petition without examining merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shri Hunuman Mandir Masadih (Baba Bihari Das Ashram)… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5382 of 2025

¶3

Shri Hunuman Mandir Masadih (Baba Bihari Das Ashram) Thru. Pandit Ram Chandar

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Bahraich And 6 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Hariom Divedi
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:

¶9

Court No. - 7

¶10

HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶12

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 to 7 is dispensed with.

¶13

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Regular Suit No.309 of 2012 (Shri Hanuman Madir village Masadih Vs. Babadeen and others) pending before the respondent No.1 since 29.05.2012.

¶14

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending Regular Suit No.309 of 2012 (Shri Hanuman Madir village Masadih Vs. Babadeen and others as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶16

A227 No. 5382 of 2025

¶17

¶18

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶19

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶20

(Jaspreet Singh,J.)

¶21

September 9, 2025

¶22

ank

¶23

Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shri Hunuman Mandir Masadih (Baba Bihari Das Ashram) Thru. Pandit Ram Chandar v. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Bahraich and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shri Hunuman Mandir Masadih (Baba Bihari Das Ashram) Thru. Pandit Ram Chandar v. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Bahraich and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Radhey Shyam Verma Vs Laxmi Shankar Upadhyaya and Ors.

M/s P.B.S. Foods Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Auth. Representative Tanuj Kumar Vs State of Uttar Pradesh through Secretary, Department of Baal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushtahaar and Anr.

Kalawati Devi @ Kalawati Vs Surendra Kumar

Ekta Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Shri Ram Vs Mahendra and 2 Others

M/S K R Agro Industries Thru. Partners Shri Vijay Kumar Sharma and Shri Apoorv Dixit and 2 Others Vs Bank of Baroda Thru. Authorised Officer