Contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the applicant's counsel nor any adjournment request appeared when the case was called out; any issued notice stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3112 of 2024
Akhilesh Mishra
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| Sri Nitesh Bhondele, Distt. Panchayat Raj Officer, Barabanki |
.....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : |
Puttan Singh |
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called out in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf to adjourn the case.
In view of the aforesaid, the present case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Notice issued, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
November 27, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Akhilesh Mishra
Sri Nitesh Bhondele, Distt. Panchayat Raj Officer, Barabanki
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
