Contempt application alleging non-compliance of a writ court order; counsel conceded compliance and sought dismissal. The High Court dismissed the contempt application as infructuous and discharged any notice issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3655 of 2024
Ram Lallan
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| Sri Medhi Lal, Consolidation Officer, Mailkipur, Ayodhya .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Kumar Pandey |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : |
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
Notice, if any, is hereby discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
November 27, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Lallan
Sri Medhi Lal, Consolidation Officer, Mailkipur, Ayodhya
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
