Irshad Ali v. State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application; Section 482 BNSS; dismissed as infructuous; efflux of time; applicant Irshad Ali; opposite parties State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Home (Lucknow) and another; counsel Dinesh Kr./Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary for applicant, G.A. for opposite parties; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 15; single-judge bench of Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.; decision dated December 4, 2025.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application under S. 482 BNSS was dismissed as infructuous, following the applicant's counsel's submission that the application had become infructuous due to efflux of time. ¶10