Dismissed

Raunak Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC3 Dec 2025NABAIL/1789/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under section 316(5) BNS was withdrawn by the applicant's counsel and dismissed as not pressed. The court granted liberty to file a regular bail application within two weeks, to be decided expeditiously in light of Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file regular bail application within two weeks, to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil.

Raunak Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1789 of 2025

Raunak Shukla

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Another	Lko. And .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Prabhaat Kumar Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 15

¶8

HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.

¶9

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶10

Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with, in view of the proposed order.

¶11

2. The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.0122 of 2025 under section 316(5) BNS, P.S.Sarojni Nagar, district Lucknow.

¶12

3. Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021 .

¶13

4. In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by

¶14

NABAIL No. 1789 of 2025

¶15

¶16

Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶17

(Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.)

¶18

December 3, 2025

¶19

kkb/

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Raunak Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raunak Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Dulari vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Devendra Kumar Kausar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./ Addl. Chief Secy. Irrigation Deptt. Govt. of Up Lko. and 2 Others

Tapish Sharma vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Deptt. of Home Govt. of U.P. and 2 Others

Udaibhan Vs State of Up. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Ajeet Kumar Nishad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Varun Kumar Mishra @ Varun Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.