Allowed

Ram Sahaj and Another v. State Pf U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home and Another

Allahabad HC8 Dec 2025/1602/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in a dowry-related FIR; interim bail already granted and applicants cooperating with investigation. The court allowed the application, directing release on bail on furnishing personal bonds with sureties, subject to standard conditions, till conclusion of trial.

What did the court decide?

Applicants to be released on anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial on personal bond of Rs.30,000/- each with two sureties, subject to conditions.

Ram Sahaj and Another Vs State Pf U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1602 of 2025

¶3

Ram Sahaj And Another

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Pf U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Misra, Rinki Devi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 12

¶8

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

¶9

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

¶10

2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.154 of 2025 under sections 85, 80(2) BNS and section 3/4 DP Act, P.S. Katra Bazar, District Gonda.

¶11

3. It is argued that the applicants were granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 03.11.2025. There is no material to suggest that the applicant is not cooperating with the investigation, as such, the interim bail granted to the applicant is made absolute till the conclusion of the trial.

¶12

4. Thus, the present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.

¶13

5. In the event of applicants Ram Sahaj and Smt. Vimla Devi surrendering before the trial court, they shall be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till conclusion of the trial on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each separately to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions:

¶14

(a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶15

NABAIL No. 1602 of 2025

¶16

¶17

(b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶18

(c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶19

(d) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

¶20

(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)

¶21

December 8, 2025

¶22

VNP/-

¶23

Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Sahaj and Another v. State Pf U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Sahaj and Another v. State Pf U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rohit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Uttam Kumar Singh Rajpoot @ Uttam Singh Rajput Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 2 Others

Maya Singh Rajpoot Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Ramakant Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. and 3 Others

Jang Bahadur Singh @ Jangi and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. and 3 Others

Km. Anuradha Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another