Allowed¶15

Ramesh Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC12 Dec 2025/12511/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail allowed; gang chart; two prior bail grants (Annexures 2 and 3); custody since 04.08.2025; Case Crime/FIR No. 0282 of 2025; Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster Act, 1986; P.S. Kheero, District Raebareli; personal bond and two sureties; affidavit undertaking under Section 19(4) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Court No. 15; Judge Karunesh Singh Pawar; December 12, 2025; BAIL No. 12511 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Ramesh Verma to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to conditions (i)-(iv), including an affidavit undertaking in terms of Section 19(4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. ¶15

Ramesh Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether Ramesh Verma, shown in a gang chart and involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 0282 of 2025 under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster Act, 1986, Police Station Kheero, District Raebareli, should be enlarged on bail.

¶16

Court's answer

Considering that the applicant is in jail since 04.08.2025, is on bail in the cases mentioned in the gang chart, and has no other criminal history, the court found it a fit case for enlarging him on bail.

¶14

Ratio / Principle

Bail was directed on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to conditions including non-tampering with prosecution evidence, non-pressurising prosecution witnesses, appearance on every date fixed by the trial court, and any further conditions the trial court may impose.

¶19

Key takeaways

Condition (iv): the applicant must submit an affidavit undertaking in terms of Section 19(4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case or misuse the liberty of bail.ratio¶23
The observations in the order are confined to the present bail application and have no bearing on the merits of the trial.obiter¶25

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 15 (Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.) — Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12511 of 2025, Ramesh Verma v. State of U.P. The applicant, shown in a gang chart with two cases in both of which he was already on bail (orders at Annexure Nos. 2 and 3) and having no other criminal history, was in jail since 04.08.2025. Holding it a fit case, the court allowed the bail application and directed release of the applicant involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 0282 of 2025 under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster Act, 1986, Police Station Kheero, District Raebareli, on a personal bond and two like sureties, subject to conditions including an affidavit undertaking in terms of Section 19(4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 not to indulge in any case or misuse the liberty of bail; observations confined to the bail application with no bearing on trial merits. Decision dated December 12, 2025.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12511 of 2025

Ramesh Verma

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

¶7

		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Aakash	Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 15

¶9

HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

Learned counsel for accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that in the gang chart, two cases have been shown against the applicant. In those cases, applicant has already been enlarged on bail. The bail orders are on record as Annexure Nos. 2 and 3 to the bail application. Apart from the cases mentioned in the gang chart, applicant has no other criminal history.

¶12

It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 04.08.2025 and, if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below and will co-operate in speedy trial of the case.

¶13

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant.

¶14

On due consideration of the facts that the applicant is languishing in jail since 04.08.2025, in the cases mentioned in the gang chart, he is on bail and has no other criminal history, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail.

¶15

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶16

Let the applicant- Ramesh Verma, involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 0282 of 2025 under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster Act, 1986, Police Station-Kheero, District-Raebareli, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two

¶17

BAIL No. 12511 of 2025

¶18

¶19

sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶20

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶21

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

¶22

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.

¶23

(iv) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail.

¶24

Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed.

¶25

It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial.

¶26

December 12, 2025 Vinay/-

¶27

(Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.)

¶28

Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ramesh Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Suraj Soni Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home and 4 Other

Dharmendra Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sumit Kumar Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Bhanu Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Ranjeet Gautam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Rajiv Nayan Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.