Bail application under Sections 437 and 439 CrPC dismissed as infructuous after the State informed the court that the accused-applicant had already been acquitted in the underlying case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3971 of 2022
Suraj Soni
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home And 4 Other .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 15
HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant well as learned Shri Alok Tewari, learned AGA.
Learned AGA, on the basis of the written instructions received, submits that the accused-applicant has already been acquitted.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that she has not received any instructions for a considerable period.
In view of the submission made by the learned AGA, the present bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
The written instructions furnished by the learned AGA are taken on record.
(Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.)
December 11, 2025
R.C.
Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Suraj Soni
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home And 4 Other
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
