Amaravati v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Revenue Lko. and 5 Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9812 of 2024
Petitioner :- Amaravati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajai Kumar Shukla,Nisha Devi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Neither the petitioner's Counsel nor the Counsel for U.P.E.I.D.A. are present.
List/Put up this case in the month of January, 2025.
Order Date :- 27.11.2024 Lokesh Kumar
[Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.]
Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amaravati
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Revenue Lko.
Coram
Lokesh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/9812/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S Lalitpur Power Generation Co. Ltd. Lalitpur Thru. Its Authorized Signatory Mr.Amit Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Chief Secy. Lko. and 4 Others
Mohd. Siddiq vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. and 4 Others
Nandlal vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 8 Others
Rajkaran Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 6 Others