Writ petition dismissed at initiative of petitioner by consent on ground that statutory remedy exists, with liberty to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71124
Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8623 of 2024
Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector,Pratapgarh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
On an objection raised by Shri Atul Kumar Mishra, learned State Counsel that the petitioner has statutory and alternative remedy of appeal, which was earlier availed by the petitioner also, Shri Sharad Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the remedy of appeal. To which there is no objection by learned State Counsel.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 22.10.2024 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Atul Kumar Srivastava
State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Pratapgarh And 3 Others
Rajnish Kumar
Ram Nareesh Banswar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
