This order dismissed a writ petition seeking to quash a revenue order. The court refused to entertain the petition because the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy available through an appeal under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64263
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8024 of 2024
Petitioner :- Brijendra Singh
Respondent :- Sub Divisional Officer, Tiloi, District- Amethi And 20 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Dhar Dubey,Roshani Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 18.9.2024 KR
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging a revenue order should be dismissed in light of the availability of a statutory appeal remedy under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Whether the High Court can entertain a writ petition under Article 226 when a specific statutory remedy exists.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Brijendra Singh
Sub Divisional Officer, Tiloi, District- Amethi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
