Dismissed
Dinesh Kumar Maurya and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others
Allahabad HC/4440/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged the location of the State Legal Services Authority via Article 227. The court held that since the Authority had provisionally adapted without raising any objection to its own functioning place, the High Court could not interfere as no matter was pending with the Authority. The petition requiring re-appearance was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's prayer to vary the order and appear again is dismissed.