A writ petition sought quashing of an order recalling an earlier interim order passed by the SDM. The court noted a statutory appeal remedy under Section 207(2)(c) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and dismissed the petition on that preliminary objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64263
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8024 of 2024
Petitioner :- Brijendra Singh
Respondent :- Sub Divisional Officer, Tiloi, District- Amethi And 20 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Dhar Dubey,Roshani Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 18.9.2024 KR
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition seeking quashing of the SDM's order recalling an interim order be entertained despite an available statutory appeal remedy?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Brijendra Singh
Sub Divisional Officer, Tiloi, District- Amethi
Others (20 respondents)
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
