Jay Prakash v. Union of India Thru. Secy., Deptt. of Petroleum and Natural Gas, New Delhi and Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7262 of 2024 Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy., Deptt. Of Petroleum And Natural Gas, New Delhi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Archana Yadav,Brijesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Shikhar Anand
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited.
This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned letter dated 17-02-2024 and letter received through e-meail dated 18-06-2024 (Contained as annexure no.5 and 7 respectively to the present writ petition) and further be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 and 3 to reconsider the candidature of petitioner for his appointment as retail outlet dealer for the Location No.1337 Village Sarya, Tehsil Dhaurahra, Ishanagar to Khamariya Road, District Lakhimpur Kheri, U.P."
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the H.P.C.L. prays for and is granted three weeks' time to file counter affidavit.
One week's time thereafter shall be available to learned counsel for the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit.
List this case on 24.09.2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jay Prakash
- respondent
Union Of India
Coram
Sangeeta Chandra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/7262/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Syed Muzaffar Agha vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko and 5 Others
Mohd. Saleem vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Food Safety) Civil Sect. and 3 Others
Sarala Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko. U.P. and 2 Others
Smt. Maya vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko and 2 Others