Sarala Devi v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko. U.P. and 2 Others
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7238 of 2024
Petitioner :- Sarala Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naresh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Zafar Aziz
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Zafar Aziz learned counsel for New India Assurance Company Limited.
This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"(a) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 20.01.2020 passed by the opposite party no.2 from the summoning of its original record which is informed by the opposite party no.3 through letter dated 20.06.2024 is contained as Annexure no.1 to the writ petition.
(b) a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the opposite parties to immediately grant the benefit admissible Rs.5,00,000/- with penalty Rs. 1000/- per week from the date of repudiation as provided in the said scheme."
Learned counsel for opposite parties pray for and are granted three weeks time to file counter affidavit. One week's time thereafter is given to learned counsel for the petitioners to file rejoinder affidavit.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order summoning the original record should be quashed.
Whether the benefit of Rs. 5,00,000/- with penalty should be granted immediately.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sarala Devi
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Commissioner and Secy Board Of Revenue Lko. U.P.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/7238/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rakesh Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others
M/S Shree Filling Station Partner Pushpa and Kaushlendra Singh Thru. P.O.A. Holder Amit Kumar Singh vs Prin. Commissioner of Income Tax -1 Lko. and Another
Saurabh Samant Maurya vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Nagar Vikash Lko.
Mohd. Saleem vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Food Safety) Civil Sect. and 3 Others