Petitioner requested to withdraw the writ petition citing no surviving cause of action. State respondents had no objection. The Court disposed of the petition accordingly.
Withdrawal of petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:116282
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6798 of 2024
Petitioner :- Pinki Devi Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dheeraj Kumar Yadav,Vivek Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar Pandey,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Dheeraj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent developments, no cause of action survives; accordingly the petitioner does not wish to pursue the matter any further.
Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents has no objection.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 22.7.2024 Faridul
[Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.]
Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pinki Devi
State Of Up And 2 Others
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
